there’s no room in there for cunnilingus. the clitoris is covered I have to constantly pull the front up so I can get access.
The lingerie fits fine otherwise, it’s just the the front covering goes too far down.
I see on LH website, the so called “crotchless” lingerie, where you would have never known if it had not said it was crotchless because they part very low down.
No idea why it was designed this way, was it just for PIV without much thought on forplay.
edit: had another look. The cotelli ones are better, but some of the other own brand stuff have the tiniest openings.
Totally agree with all the comments on here .the split is always way too small .not a lot of thought goes into the design I feel.makes them a bit pointless for me so have given up wearing them.i now prefer just to wear a suspender belt and stocking or a corset with attached suspenders and just leave knickers off .
@batjamboree Yes! Even the softest edge of fabric can chafe the shaft if it’s repeatedly rubbing the same place. Especially if things get a little wet down there!
@batjamboree I quite often find lace trim to be somewhat abrasive. I had a pair of crotchless panties I sent back without wearing that had lace round the crotchless bit and it really rubbed my finger as I simulated a cock going through it. Nasty.
I have had similar problems with the opening being too small , along with too low for my cock . Had one pair where the best I could do was have my balls carefully fed through with my cock contained . Actually displayed my hairless balls rather nicely . Here , let me post a photo , oops I forgot for a moment . This pair is one of the better crotchless ones . https://lovehoneyforum.com/t/members-photo-uploads/257652/3155