Good sir, you tag me in a post and of course I appear just as soon as I possibly can.
Just what is a domestic dominant? Only you could turn my own question back against me! 
First, I feel it would be only right and proper (and natural!) to share with you my first thoughts:
“There’s only a small step between domestic and domestic-ated, which a Dominant would become in my harem”

But also I think “domestic” and “domesticated” implies a sense of being, you know, tamed, which I’m quite sure no Dominant wants to be! So then, how do we define it?
Well then, as I said, the nearest thing that I could find on Google is domestic violence, and given I also said that the pivotal difference between domestic violence and BDSM is consent, we know it’s not about that. So then, is it perhaps simply domestic violence with consent? That also gets a clear and resounding “no”, for what I hope would be all too obvious reasons!
So then, if it’s not one, and it’s not the other, just what is a domestic dominant?
To me, a “domestic dominant” is one who is a natural leader in their home, but are perhaps also respected as natural leaders outside of it. It’s not simply a role they choose for themselves nor is it something they pretend to be, it’s something they are, naturally, and partners and people are naturally drawn towards them and their calming sense of knowledge and authority.
I hope this gives it some definition, sir 
I hope this post is of use as well. In it, I’ve sort of alluded to being a natural leader myself, but having chosen to hand over the reins to someone else: it’s not to say that I can’t lead in relationships, but that I choose not to, because I don’t have the desire to lead 