I've never actually had sex with anyone who was circumsized, but they do look a lot cleaner and just...nicer, so I would probably have to say that's my preference but without any real experience I can't say for sure.
For what my girlfriend has told me she much prefers the look and thought of uncut, but she would say that I am. I'd have to agree with her that cut 1s when flaccid look wierd, its a bit random having a skin coloured cock and then a pink bauble on the end, i guess thats simply cos i'm not used to seeing that. It doesnt look wierd when erect. Circ scars are also horrible to look at.
She has also told me she prefers the options the skin gives. I guess some peoples preference comes down to what type of person you are, my girls a giver (WHOO!) and it gets her off immensely getting me off and my foreskin helps to do that so she prefers it. Someone who doesnt understand it's role or doesnt get off as much giving might be happier with a 'cleaner looking' cock as it makes it more enjoyable for themselves.
I do agree with many of the others posters that at the end of the day I don't think preference should be an issue, its a highly sensitive organ that many people have taken away with little choice and no consent and that would normally be a crime, i guess we get to that out dated cultures and religion for that! I's support a women's choice on how her genitals looked just as I would support any man's, IF they are actually old enough.
It's certainly plays a big part in my pleasure, not much beats a tung underneath your foreskin stroking the head of your cock... MMM!
I'm not circumsized and I don't think I'd want to be. Apart from anything else, it all pretty much slides back when I get an erection anyway, and the feeling of the skin sliding over the end is great... and I've never had a complaint about it.
If an uncircumsized guy has a smelly cheesy dick it is definitley because he doesn't wash... not because of the prescence of foreskin.
The OH is uncircumsized, as were my exes who I gave handjobs to. It really doesn't bother me, although I've often wondered what it'd be like to give a hand/blowjob to a circumsized bloke.
I personally prefer them circumcised. I feel they're cleaner and better looking ... although they're not what I'd call a beautiful sight at the best of times!
How you guys walk with those things amazes me.
Am not looking at anyone in particular and am not making any judgement on their opinions but does anyone sense any degree of hypocrisy concerning circumcision.
If I placed a post questioning the look of a lady’s part and believed it ‘could be improved’ through surgery and encouraged her to ‘trim’ or tighten up, I’d rightly have many posters come down on me like a ton of bricks!
The consensus here (http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/community/forums/orgasm-army/sex-talk/23320-the-perfect-vagina/ ) was that vaginas are lovely however they are!
I just feel that posts such as these trivialise the issue and makes an unacceptable barbaric practice acceptable and justifiable. To the best of my knowledge, that’s pretty much what happens in the few countries were FGM practiced. A practice does not become right simply because lots of people engage in it but it does make it more acceptable. I understand many people have the procedure for valid reasons, my concern is primarily about people pressured into it or when it is preformed without consent.
But what about us non-circumsised chaps who do know how to wash and look after ourselves?
At 66 do I have it cut-off?
Cheers.
Stu xx
Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";}
FGM is carried out for many reasons as well as to reduce pleasure, to physically control virginity, for aesthetic reasons, hygiene and most often cultural. No matter how deplorable those views I see many striking similarities between the justifications that have been used for both male and female circumcision, all, bar one, are still used now as a justification about male circumcision.
The fact that these arguments are now outdated on female circumcision leads me to conclude that the practice of male circumcision is outdated and by proxy the cultures that practice it, secular or religious. Any culture religious or otherwise that advocates mutilation of a perfectly healthy body is outdated.
But of course I understand many people disagree. Outdated is of course a subjective term, for example I believe all religions are outdated, we have improved theories and ways of understanding the world that people did not have thousands of years ago. So they turned to the sun, Zeus etc. ‘til they arrived at the big bushy bearded bloke in the sky, no matter how ridiculous I find that, some people will base their whole life on it. I agree to disagree... even if I never really understood why people (including me) say it!
i was sure id posted on here before :-S
anyway... i lost my V to a bloke who was circumicised (which was a huge mistake, not him being circumicised but him being the wrong person to lose it to) but i didnt really think much about it take notie of it... was my first time so was more nervose ect ect. ....since then my ex and my bf now have foreskins and i still dont see that they make any differance its just part of them and just cos theyve got there foreskins ive never known my bloke to have a dirty smelly dick.
and also want to say i love looking at my blokes cock, i dont think its ugly at all! which i think makes me the odd one on here lol.
Dxx
Well... I dont want to interrupt an argument here...and I hope you dont mind my posting my opinion....
In my experience of both I have to say....(and of course this is only my opinion)
with uncut there is the extra bit to play with.. orally and with your hands... but I truly do think the sensitivity lies with the man in question and how intune he is with his cock...
with the circumcised as my current BF is its amazingly new and different..(to me) but the feel of it doesnt make 1 bit of difference to me.. because its a part of him and I love it....
he was very shy to start with and even though were 5 months into our relationship i have only blown him off twice because he is a little embarrassed.... I love doing it and wuld do it every night if I could ... and am planning on doing it this weeekend... and because i havnt done it much I cant wait... ! :) and iv even told him this morning in a text 'the thought of your big hard tasty cock in my mouth is really making me so so horny' (woooo lol)
he does seem a little desensetised though meaning he can push it into me really hard sometimes it chafes (lol) but doesnt phase him where i noticed with the uncut man they tend to take it gently as it hurts them too if they push it in too hard....but again this could be due ow intune the man is and how he wants it to feel !
during sex doesnt feel any different... dont know if thats because im lucky and have a BF with a very big cock though lol
now looking at my BF cut cock... drives me wild with desire... both in its soft state before sex and when its hard...
and after sex... its amazing.. its so gorgeous the way it goes limp but he still keeps a massive bell end... mmm I makes me want to do it all over again !! (but he cant lol)
I have no problem with either cut or uncut... I wouldnt have my son cut unless it was for medical reasons... as I prefer to let him choose his own direction as I have done with religion....
I just like to make the best out of anything... and I am so happy with my BF cut cock !!
When I get an erection my foreskin rides back off the head anyway so you wouldn't know if I were circumcised or not . I like the incredible sensation that un uncut penis gives when you first enter during sex and the option to masturbate with the foreskin or lubed up with the skin back.
I was circumcised at the age of four for medical reasons. Apparently I had too much foreskin, i'm still not sure what that means as I can't remember my pre-cut fellow.
As for sensitivity I don't think it changes anything. I do last for a long time but sheepishly I confess this was not always the case and something that I worked at for the benefit of partners. Concerning hand jobs I have no problem on my own but will admit that lube is required when its the OH doing the work, I did I have a bad experience with a previous partner who was over zealous without lube and left me out of action for about a week. Although I think it would have been the same if I was uncut! She was dangerous lol
I will admit that when I was a teenager and yet to have my first sexual encounter being cut did play on my mind. But this was because when talking to one of my cousins partners she said she would never go out with a cut man as they were in her words 'disgusting'. Obviously since then I have found those worries were completely unfounded phew! And the only partners who have even mentioned my being cut have only done so as its something they hadn't experienced and couldn't wait to try it out!
Overall I really dont think it matters, you will find bad and good lovers in both camps and at the end of the day its the person its attatched that matters.
IMO its very much an americanised thing to circumxise and us bruts well, just dont care.
I wont pretend to know alot about this but from what I can tell circumcised = desensitising the head of the penis and IMO thats a bad thing.
As for the woman I cant imagine it feeling all that much difference, but as I have no way of knowing that, its pretty much just a guess. hehe.
i would hate being circumsized lol! and as most people have said, if you have problems with cheese you might want to think about washing!
i use my girls "feminine bits" wash in the shower, it's quite nice lol!
Most men I know wash well, but some do not. One advantage for me of a circumcised cock is that because everything is already visible, there will be no unpleasant washing-related surprises. Yes, I know, you all wash like a surgeon scrubbing for surgery, I know, but believe me, finding gunk under a foreskin is a sure-fire passion-killer. Finding it once is quite enough to teach me to approach any new foreskin with considerable caution. Finding it more than once is more than enough to teach me that no matter how much a man protests his surgically clean scrubbingness, I'm sure as hell going to check out that new foreskin before I even take my shoes off. Any man who thinks my precautions are unreasonable is going to enjoy their sexual life entirely without me. For me, this has been an issue. Circumcised cocks make this whole checking thing a whole lot more pleasant for me.
Also, being Jewish, I am accustomed to circumcised cocks and that is another reason why those are my personal preference.
Oh, also, the people who have problems with gunk under the foreskin are not the ones who are responsible for doing the washing, they are the partners of the insufficiently washed, so that's another problem with it.
Lubyanka wrote:
Oh, also, the people who have problems with gunk under the foreskin are not the ones who are responsible for doing the washing, they are the partners of the insufficiently washed, so that's another problem with it.
i've re-read that a few times and i can't make sense of it lol! it's probably cos i've recently woke up and my brain is still asleep lol!
are you saying the women suffer not the guy? i dunno lol i might just crawl back under my rock lol Where that "how to read forum posts for dummies" book gone......External Media
DD, she means that it makes no difference to a bloke if he has a gunky foreskin, it's the PARTNER of that bloke who has to deal with it... unless the guy in question is capable of fellating himself :P
Dunno about anybody else but dirty foreskin is icky :/ I mean you'd clean your armpits so why not your foreskin! Some people are weird.
shellyboo wrote:
DD, she means that it makes no difference to a bloke if he has a gunky foreskin, it's the PARTNER of that bloke who has to deal with it... unless the guy in question is capable of fellating himself :P
that's just crazy lol! how could anyone live with it though? lol
i mean it's just insanely gross! a buildup of dead cells means you haven't washed them away! surely everyone showers at least once a day??? How can it ever get soo bad that there's enough there to even be noticeable?
The mind boggles...External Media