Doctor finds G-spot in cadaver of 83-year-old woman:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/04/25/g-spot-sex-anatomy.html
How come nobody ever performed a dissection in order to find out whether G-spot exists or not before?
I hope so, i'm desperate to find mine!
I didnt think it existed until it was found. Its not as far in as you think and its a soft piece of tissue probably around the size of a 10p coin perhaps smaller. I wouldnt have found it myself though. Get your man practising on you 2nd chance x
Dee_licious333 wrote:
I didnt think it existed until it was found. Its not as far in as you think and its a soft piece of tissue probably around the size of a 10p coin perhaps smaller. I wouldnt have found it myself though. Get your man practising on you 2nd chance x
That's the plan for the weekend, no kids and lots of play xx
i think everyone's is different- mine is quite high up and feels like a soft little bean! it's a nubbin!!
mine doesn't really respond to internal vibrators much though so that never work on me- needs manual stimulation! lol
is there a g spot sat nav available? lol
From what I keep hearing, it sounds like the G Spot isn't so much does/doesn't exist, but more like boobs. Different women just have different shapes and sizes.
I saw a trashy American tv programme where one of the characters had an injection internally (probably collagen) to make her g-spot more pronounced and easier to be accessed during sex... Does such a treatment exist? Or is it too good to be true?
Lolliepop80 wrote:
I saw a trashy American tv programme where one of the characters had an injection internally (probably collagen) to make her g-spot more pronounced and easier to be accessed during sex... Does such a treatment exist? Or is it too good to be true?
Wouldn't surprise me, I've heard stories of people having a 'hymenplasty', where surgeons recreate a hymen, so I'd say anything is possible.
It's true, doctors inject a filler to the g-spot:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-179695/How-boost-libido-lunch-hour.html
2Wicked wrote:
It's true, doctors inject a filler to the g-spot:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-179695/How-boost-libido-lunch-hour.html
Hehe! I don't doubt you - but using the Mail as a source is not usually preceded by the statement "it's true"!
Made me smile :)
Adxx
Alicia D'amore wrote:
Hehe! I don't doubt you - but using the Mail as a source is not usually preceded by the statement "it's true"!
Agreed!
Sorry about that link, posted it mainly because it was about how a woman experienced the procedure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Spot_amplification
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PictureOfHealth/story?id=4312986&page=1#.T5sq5FFLS8A
Better now? 
2Wicked wrote:
Sorry about that link, posted it mainly because it was about how a woman experienced the procedure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Spot_amplification
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PictureOfHealth/story?id=4312986&page=1#.T5sq5FFLS8A
Better now?
As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P
Adxx
Alicia D'amore wrote:
As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P
I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .
ShaftMaster wrote:
Alicia D'amore wrote:
As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P
I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .
Hence the tongue smiley!
I didn't say it was reliable either - just more reliable than the Daily Mail....but then it's hard to think of many things that *aren't* more reliable than the Daily Mail.
Adx
Alicia D'amore wrote:
ShaftMaster wrote:
Alicia D'amore wrote:
As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P
I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .
Hence the tongue smiley!
I didn't say it was reliable either - just more reliable than the Daily Mail....but then it's hard to think of many things that *aren't* more reliable than the Daily Mail.
Adx
That's true. Maybe the Daily Star?
At this point, I should also explain that by saying "it's true", I wasn't referring to that particular article/link, therefore it really depends on how you read anything. I knew about g-spot amplification long before posting anything about it here and surely didn't rely on any online source of information. I discussed it with a doctor years ago, which (to me) is reliable. I apologise for not being able to post a link about that discussion here.
Don't worry 2W I knew you wouldn't be basing it on that :) I know you value reliable evidence and the like!
Adxx
Tried last night, couldn't find it!