Hey y'all
I know this has been asked before but I can't find any recent threads on the subject....
I've had an hormonal implant for the past 6 years and the one I have now is due (overdue in fact) to be removed.
As this most recent implant was pretty much a nightmare from the start, I'm thinking about moving onto something different for my next form of contraception.
This brings me onto the coil options.
My main sticking points on making a decision are:
1) I would like to go hormone free for my overall health and well-being. For this, the coppr coil would be best.
BUT
2) If the copper coil is as effective as they say, why the hell is there a hormonal option? Do the hormones make it more effective? If so, surely the Mirena would be the better choice.
In addition, the hormonal coil has a waiting list, the copper one doesn't. This tells me that people generally prefer the hormonal version (do they feel more protected or do they not want to be covered for 10 years?).
I want to be as covered as I possibly can be against pregnancy, whilst also limiting the amount of hormones going into my body. I would also prefer to be covered ASAP, rather than waiting a long time - but if it's worth the wait then I'm cool with that.
I've done a lot of research on both types of coil, and know the ins-and-outs of the general side effects, benefits of each etc etc, but I'm looking for some personal experiences.
Have you had either of them? Or maybe you've tried both? Why did you choose the one you went for? Do you think its worth going on a waiting list for the hormonal option?
Any insight into your experience, from the procedure to how you feel since you've had it would be much appreciated.
I have an appointment booked next Monday to have my implant removed from my arm, and have said to them I'd like to chat about my other options, but if I can go in with a decision already in my mind, I can perhaps get that done at the same time.
Thanks!