Sorry been out all afternoon. @Green_Eyed_Girl , if it’s jumping to code instead of posting the picture as you want it it’s either the wrong vertical line or more likely a space left before or after it or between the two sets of brackets.
However, for the reviews I absolutely use @Ian_Chimp 's template as it works perfectly and it negates the need to use my brain which is always appreciated 
.
Ah, yes. I think I skipped that bit. Another good reason to check these things with @Peitho. 
thanks dude. think it might be the wrong type of quote marks. my ipad makes ones different to the ones in the template just to be awkward.
yeah, template is incredibly helpful. wish id realized there was one before doing most of them by hand. would have saved alot of coding mistakes. good practice though
hmm, works now. maybe i needed the extra space
Sorry, that’s my bad. I’ll write an edit and ask Brenna to slip it in to the OP to make it more obvious.
Edit: Would swopping this:
with this:
The formatting is up to you, but if you need any pointers I’m happy to help. And there’s even a template you can use/modify in The Sandbox
be enough? Or do I need more?
link is fine
go for that, less hassle
The
<div align="center">
is html, and it doesn’t like sitting directly next to bbcode or Markdown (eg [image] or [poll]), though will happily work with a space inbetween. I broke a PotW poll the other day by doing a similar thing.
Mixing the different code can be a bit hit and miss, but some of the results make the trial and error worth it.
I think the switch to say there is a template you can use/modify if you wish would be perfect . Doesn’t need any more but saying there is a template might encourage more less tech savvy people to give it a go. Certainly makes it much easier than trying to recreate it from scratch. @Green_Eyed_Girl I’m very impressed you did!
Saying that I still have about 80 odd reviews to add so I really shouldn’t preach 
i have very basic coding skills, ive written wiki pages and stuff before. plus markdown is what discord runs on, so kind of helps i use it in a very very basic manner on a regular basis. some of the commands, like italic, i use on an almost daily basis. (plus markdown is super easy to code. made to be easy to write in theory xD )
fudge, 80?…do not envy you that one. im still struggling to find mine and i only have maybe 20-30 tops
If anyone wants to play around with the sex toy glossary - wiki draft entries, here is a dummy one so you can see and muck with the code to your hearts content. Have fun 
A whip is a flexible device with a contact area that is used to inflict pain upon impact with the skin. The most common whips are bull whips (a la Indiana Jones) which were traditionally used for farming to keep cattle under control, horse whips such as riding crops and the longer dressage whips and floggers.
Blady brilliant, is there a way to see my profile as others see it? I’ve just discovered this fine art, okay it’s taken awhile but the tortoise won the race right? 
love the dog pic
I think if it’s set to public (as yours is) we see what you do if you’re looking at the expanded summary, so lovely doggie background, your intro, when you joined, stats, etc.
If you click on @Green_Eyed_Girl (also great profile picture and background picture combination!) you’ll see the information we see when we look at yours.
@Peitho Thank you for explaining can’t believe some of the features since coming here. There’s only a couple of things that bother me now, mainly accessibility to people’s reviews cos it’s way easier to look at certain people’s when you know you’s have similar tastes or are the same size when it comes to lingerie.
The features are really good though uploading pics sections are super cool 
I daint realise people would see the doggy, lucky I’m not overly fussed about anonymity @Green_Eyed_Girl tagging you in too. Thanks again
No problem and I do agree on the reviews… hopefully that will come back soon! 
Yeah, i think we all have our fingers crossed on that one. Thanks for the compliment on the background/picture choice. I thought i might as well commit and go with the inadvertent nautical theme 
Yeah fingers crossed for the reviews it’ll be devastating for people likely yourselves that’s written many of them for em to vanish from your accounts 
I’d of thought they’d come back as it makes sense for them to be on profiles. You’d think they’d be back by now though? Then again there’s still other features like the wishlist that’s not sorted yet and lovehoney unlimited so there’s defiantly hope
Out of interest what doggy pics ups and please say it’s not one of any human form lurking 
Lying down, happy, smiley tongue face 
, no humans… you should be able to see if you go to your own profile summary and click expand (though I’m on my phone so it might be different buttons on a laptop?)
The sweat leaves my face yeah I love that piccy, it’s posted everywhere I’m on phone too, I’ll give that a try just shortly n thanks again
Edit, yasss smashed it why the action didn’t seem to work is a mystery. It’s not the pic I thought, very similar mind 
Hi @Ian_Chimp , thought I’d ask here… so most of the reviews I’ve posted in the forum thread so far have been for my top rated things that I tend to talk about and recommend a lot (which makes sense). I haven’t bothered so far with stuff I’m kind of meh about as I don’t tend to talk about it. I thought though that the negative reviews, that I think do offer useful information would be useful.
My query though is about one I wrote for the Fun Factory Stronic Thrusting Rabbit. It is no longer stocked, which surprised me as I thought I’d seen it not that long ago. I think the review would still be useful as parts of it probably relate to similar FF toys and it was by far my biggest vibrator purchase mistake. Do I still write it up in the forum though there isn’t a link or photo to include?
It’s completely up to you. I’ve included some of mine from back-up copies as there’s no longer a page on the shopping site, and some of those don’t have pictures or links.
If you have an old style link, you can feed it into the wayback machine, and they often have an archived page you can grab a Lovehoney photo from (though not always). If you’re super lucky you can sometimes find a lost review that way too.
What was the name of the toy?
Edit: Is it the Bi Fusion?