http://www.norm.org/lost.html
I was circumcised at about age 12, and while i hadn't had sex at that stage, masturbation was infinitley better before i was cut. It's a shame that your boyfriend was cut for what would appear to be a simple case of phimosis that can be treated homeopathically and without a knife, but money hungry doctors would never admit there was an alternative, no!
The hard truth about it is that he will have lost everything in that list above, and for a lot of people sex is worse after being cut. One guy who was like me but was cut later (so he had been shagging before it was done) rated sex with a natural foreskin as a 10, without as a 3 and after restoring a 7.
Circumcision is a pointless operation that serves no purpose in the majority of cases; in the US Doctors spout fallacy after fallacy about being better protected from aids and it being cleaner, but we're in the 21st century, we have showers, there is no reason why cleanliness should be a problem. These Doctors consequentally make a lot of money from both the operation and the resulting foreskin.
@Geordie Paul, without meaning so sound argumentative, you admit you dont know what it was like before so you can't possibly tell if you're desensitised or not.
A lot of what i have read suggests that circumcision was the norm in the UK up to a point where all the false reasons for doing the procedure were proved to be so. In the US this didnt happen, so over there its a cultural thing that is proving hard to kill. So many American women prefer the look of the circumcised penis and would choose to do it to their sons - they believe it is no big deal, but when anti-circumcision groups then pose the question to them 'would you mind having your clitoral hood removed' they pass it off as not equivalent and a ridiculous notion. Ultimately this is not the case, the clitoral hood and the foreskin are the same before the split in the womb takes place.
I don't mean to depress you here, Moomin, but i felt that you should at least have access to one side of the coin here. The fact of the matter is that a lot of circumcised adults will defend aggressivly that their penis's are better and not at all diminished in anyway, but the truth is that a large percentage of natural erogenous tissue is removed in the operation - to me that is really bad and unnacceptable in the grand scheme of things, all in the persuit of a quick fix (typical western medicine) or in the name of some medical fallacy that has been proved time and time again to be so.
However, your boyfriend may have no trouble at all, and if that is so then great. If sex was painful before then i can imagine that he shall be very happy. If it helps, after my operation i healed fully within a few weeks. If, however, he finds that feeling is diminished or begins to have a problem with premature ejaculation (many restored men reported that premature ejaculatory problems were solved by restoring) then you may want to point him in the direction of a few restoration networks. I shall post a few links at the end of this message.
I Can only hope that the surgeon cut him loose and retained the frenulum. If this is not the case then i would be seriously cross with them as the knolwedge that the frenulum is a very erogenous area is known to the entire medical profession.
I wish you both all the best.
http://www.restoreforeskin.org/
http://www.foreskin-restoration.net/forum/